August 10, 2026

Special and Regular Meetings – February 12, 2014

Special and Regular Meetings, Wednesday, February 12, 2014, 4:00 p.m. Government Center, Verona, VA.

PRESENT: Larry J. Wills, Chairman
Michael L. Shull, Vice-Chairman
David A. Karaffa
Jeffrey A. Moore
Marshall W. Pattie
Tracy C. Pyles, Jr.
Timmy Fitzgerald, Director of Community Development
Jennifer M. Whetzel, Director of Finance
Patrick J. Morgan, County Attorney
Patrick J. Coffield, County Administrator
Rita R. Austin, CMC, Executive Secretary

ABSENT: David R. Beyeler, deceased

VIRGINIA: At a special and regular meeting of the Augusta County Board of Supervisors held on Wednesday, February 12, 2014, at 4:00 p.m., at the Government Center, Verona, Virginia, and in the 238th year of the Commonwealth….

SUPERVISORS’ OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS GOAL SETTING

Chairman Wills mentioned that a list of questions had been distributed previously to the Board to review and provide answers for tonight’s discussion. At the Organization Meeting, Chairman Wills had expressed the importance that the Board identify goals and opportunities for the next two years so that the public and staff can understand the Board of Supervisors’ priorities. He thanked Messrs. Pyles and Moore for their guidance as past chair(s) through the last two years.

Chairman Wills opened discussion and requested Board members to share their thoughts.

AUGUSTA COUNTY

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS (BOS) ASSESSMENT

1. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE TOP THREE PROBLEMS CURRENTLY FACING

AUGUSTA COUNTY.

Responses from the Board:

Mr. Moore: 1) Fire and Rescue; 2) Sheriff’s Department; and 3) School funding Mr. Karaffa: 1) Fire and Rescue (Volunteers); 2) School funding; and 3) Economic Development Mr. Pyles: 1) Lack of State support; 2) Keep taxes low; 3) Schools – equalize resources; and 4) Regionalism with other cities Mr. Pattie: 1) Water Plan – more comprehensive water monitoring; and 2) Internet/broadband usage Mr. Shull: 1) Fire and Rescue; 2) Fire and Rescue; 3) Law Enforcement; and 4) Economic Growth Chm. Wills: 1) Public Safety; 2) Fire and Rescue Five-Year Plan Updated to identify needs and fundability; and 3) Stormwater/MS4 implementation

2. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE TOP THREE OPPORTUNITIES BEFORE AUGUSTA

COUNTY.

Chm. Wills: 1) Economic Development – “heads up on continued effort”; and 2) Take advantage of an improved economy – unemployment rate continues to drop.

Mr. Moore: 1) Weyers Cave site – water and sewer access; and 2) MPO – access to properties Mr. Shull: 1) Regionalism with surrounding counties with improving economy

3. WHAT MAKES YOU PROUD OF AUGUSTA COUNTY?

Mr. Pyles: 1) People – “faithful taxpaying honest people”; 2) Employees – good values – few complaints; and 3) Development – “good diversification foundation base of value” for Industry/Business/Agriculture; and 3) Interstates provide an economical advantage Mr. Pattie: 1) People – “Independent Thinkers; highly skilled worker base; and Southern culture” Mr. Shull: 1) People – good work ethic; 2) Location – 4 seasons; 3) Schools – turnout of best students; and 4) Rural areas – “beautiful setting at a slower pace of life” Mr. Moore: 1) People; 2) Pretty area with 4 seasons; 3) Community involvement from businesses Mr. Karaffa: 1) “God’s Country”; and 2) Blue Ridge Community College Chm. Wills: 1) Citizens/diversity; 2) Blue Ridge Community College; 3) Education – with UVA, JMU and Mary Baldwin where adult degrees are offered; and 3) Productive community

4. PLEASE LIST IN ORDER OF PRIORITY THE CORE SERVICES AUGUSTA

COUNTY SHOULD OFFER LOCAL RESIDENTS USING COUNTY FUNDS.

Mr. Shull: With children – 1) Schools; 2) Fire and Rescue; and 3) Law Enforcement; Without children – 1) Fire and Rescue; 2) Schools; and 3) Law Enforcement Mr. Karaffa: 1) Agreed with Mr. Shull and 2) Economic Development – roads Mr. Moore: 1) Depending on life cycle, the importance would be determined (same as mentioned above); and 2) More revenue is needed Mr. Pattie: 1) Schools; 2) Fire and Rescue; and 3) Roads Mr. Pyles: Agreed with what everyone has mentioned above. “Important to have a nice community – challenges are tied to the State. What we have seen from the State is failure. Lost money on schools. Lost money on roads.

Lost money for constitutional offices.” Mr. Wills: Agreed with what has been said, but added Community Development planning – Building Codes for safety issues.

5. IDENTIFY THREE THINGS YOU PERSONALLY WANT TO ACCOMPLISH AS

A BOS MEMBER IN THE NEXT TWO YEARS.

Mr. Shull: 1) Riverheads Elementary School; 2) Riverheads Middle School; and 3) Volunteer Fire and Rescue Mr. Pattie: 1) EPA potential preparation; 2) Internet/broadband implementation; and 3) Schools – “Instruction versus Construction” Mr. Pyles: 1) Internet availability; 2) Taxes – demonstrate usage most economically and not raise taxes; and 3) Schools – Kindergarten-7 and 8-12 configuration Mr. Moore: 1) Roads; and 2) new Economic Development Mr. Karaffa: 1) New industry; 2) Economic Development website improved; 3) Augusta County Service Authority – shared services; 4) Water Tank at Mill Place; and 5) Verona Park Chm. Wills: 1) New industry; 2) Megasite in Weyers Cave – identify needs for sewer, roads, etc.; and 3) Adopt Fire and Rescue Five-Year Plan

6. HOW SHOULD WE ADDRESS BALANCING REVENUES WITH

EXPENDITURES, DEBT, ETC., I.E., THE COUNTY’S FISCAL POLICY?

Mr. Karaffa: Replace CIP funds which, for the last two years, has been going to Schools to offset their State Composite Index shortfall ($1.2 million).

Mr. Shull: Communicate to the public the allocation of money spent. Explain what needs are and costs associated.

Mr. Pattie: “Pay as you go policy versus bonding with capital needs.” Mr. Pyles: Keep taxes at 51¢ Mr. Moore: More revenue needed for schools, Fire and Rescue, courthouse and new economic growth.

Chm. Wills: Commented that prior to 2009 the County covered both Operating and Capital needs with the 58¢ tax rate. By reducing to 48¢ and now 51¢, we do not have sufficient funding to address all capital needs with “cuts”; therefore, we need to look at bonding future Capital projects.

7. LOOKING AHEAD TWO YEARS TO 2016, WHAT ISSUES WILL DOMINATE

AS COUNTY CONCERNS?

Mr. Pattie: EPA expenditures and the efficiency in government.

Mr. Pyles: Schools; Taxes; and State Funding (more appropriately spent) Mr. Shull: Schools; Fire and Rescue; Law Enforcement; Roads – “Can’t fix all problems.” He commended staff for balancing the money.

Mr. Moore: More revenue; State funding; Growth; and Tax rate Mr. Karaffa: Fire and Rescue; Roads; Schools; and State funding Chm. Wills: Tax rates Chairman Wills thanked the Board for its response.

A 10-minute recess was taken at 5:30 p.m.

Chairman Wills made the following statement regarding the passing away of Supervisor Beyeler:

We start this evening with a very heavy heart. We will deeply miss our Board member, Dave Beyeler, who passed away earlier today. Dave was a dedicated public servant and we certainly wish his family strength through this process.

Chairman Wills led us with the Pledge of Allegiance.

David A. Karaffa, Supervisor for the Beverley Manor District, delivered invocation.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VACANCY – SOUTH RIVER MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT

Chairman Wills asked that Mr. Coffield explain the process of a Board of Supervisors vacancy. Mr. Coffield reported that the State Code provides two procedures.

Procedure 2 is applicable today. The State Code requires that, within fifteen days of the vacancy, the remaining members of the Board will need to petition the Circuit Court for a writ for a special election. Included in the packet of information, Mr. Morgan has drafted the writ for review. Within forty-five days of the vacancy, the Board members may make an interim appointment to fill the seat. If the Board cannot make this appointment, the Circuit Court Judges will make this appointment. A Supervisor appointed to fill such vacancy must qualify and give bond within thirty days of their appointment. Timetable for Procedure #2 begins today, February 12th. The individual appointed must qualify within 30 days of appointment: A) Oath by the Circuit Court Clerk; B) Bond – provided by the County Finance Director; and C) Residency – certified by the General Registrar. Special Election would be on November 4, 2014. Next Board of Supervisors General Election would be on Tuesday, November 3, 2015. Also, included in the packet, was a timetable for the interview/selection; sample interview questions and draft press release.

Chairman Wills added that the time frame was considered because of a scheduling conflict for him and possible inclement weather. He emphasized that all six of the Board members are needed. He noted that Saturday, March 15th, could be used if needed.

He reiterated that the writ of election needs to be filed with the Court.

Mr. Karaffa moved, seconded by Mr. Shull, that the Board authorize submittal of the writ of election to the Circuit Court.

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VACANCY – SOUTH RIVER MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT

Vote was as follows: Yeas: Pattie, Karaffa, Shull, Wills, Moore and Pyles Nays: None Motion carried.

Chairman Wills asked that the Board review the Press Release and let Mr. Coffield know of any revisions.

Mr. Karaffa asked for clarification of where the resumes were to be mailed to. Chairman Wills suggested that an informational packet be created for those who were interested in applying for the position. It was determined by the Board to direct all questions to Mr. Coffield, as the Clerk of the Board.

MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC – NONE

MILL PLACE COMMERCE PARK – EASEMENT

The Board considered easement received from Columbia Gas of Virginia for constructing, installing and maintaining a gas line to Mill Place Commerce Park.

Timmy Fitzgerald, Director of Community Development, displayed property and noted that this is for an easement for a gas line that would go up along Mill Place Commerce Park from the City of Staunton that would serve the Shamrock facility and the remaining portions of the Park. The original plat brought the gas line directly down along beside Mill Place Parkway. He noted the existing water line (blue) was noted on the plat with the gas line easement on top of the water line. They have suggested where the gas line should be installed (marked in red). That change will be made on the deed before recording.

Mr. Karaffa moved, seconded by Mr. Shull, that the Board approve the easement.

Vote was as follows: Yeas: Pattie, Karaffa, Shull, Wills, Moore and Pyles Nays: None Motion carried.

ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS

The Board considered advertising for the following ordinance amendments:

a) 24-2 – Fireflow in Residential development (BOS only) b) 24-3 – Sewer connection fees in certain designated areas in the County (BOS only) c) 25-664 – Non-conforming lots (BOS & PC) d) 25-672 – Site plans (BOS & PC) e) 1-9 – Augusta County Code – maintenance of Code copies (BOS only) Mr. Fitzgerald noted that these ordinances will need to be advertised for public hearings. Chairman Wills suggested that a vote be made on each ordinance individually.

§ 24-3: Greenville Sewer System • Currently the connection fees are set at $9700 • Amendment will allow connection fees to change as fees charged by the ACSA and the privilege fee, as applicable, are changed.

• Also deletes the reference to the water and sewer requirements contained in the Urban Service Overlay District which has been repealed.

Mr. Fitzgerald advised that there was a specific amount of money in the ordinance stating what had to be paid for connection. It was learned, as fees change (such as the privilege fee) this revision needs to be made to “capture all those costs”.

Chairman Wills noted that fee was set higher than the standard current fee for the Service Authority. He wanted to be sure that this fee would not infer that the fee charged would be the fee currently being charged to other customers in other sections of the County. Mr. Fitzgerald said that the ordinance would designate that they would have to pay the “privilege” fee on top of the “connection” fee. He explained that they pay the normal connection fee that the Service Authority charges for any other customer in the County; however, they then pay an additional “privilege” fee, which is the fee to the developer who built the water treatment plant.

Mr. Fitzgerald emphasized that, currently, the ordinance does not allow the County to collect enough money in order to pay the privilege fee. “This would give us the ability to make it whole and have the customer pay the entire cost.” Mr. Fitzgerald clarified that tonight’s consideration from the Board is to authorize staff to advertise for public hearings as early as possible for all of the above-mentioned ordinances.

Mr. Karaffa moved, seconded by Mr. Shull, that the Board authorize staff to advertise for public hearing.

Vote was as follows: Yeas: Pattie, Karaffa, Shull, Wills, Moore and Pyles Nays: None Motion carried.

* * * §24-2: Fire Flow Requirements – Residential Developments • Current ordinance has gaps between distances which could cause issues in interpretation • Establishes requirements:

– Buildings 100’ apart or greater: 500 gpm – 30’ or more, but less than 100’: 750 gpm – More than 10’, but less than 30’: 1000 gpm – 10’ or less: 1500 gpm Mr. Fitzgerald explained that this ordinance makes it clearer.

Mr. Moore expressed concern of areas where there are deficiencies that the Board would work with the Service Authority with funding to increase the size of lines to provide fire flow that is required and to allow the Service Authority to provide better service.

Chairman Wills mentioned that this was an Augusta County requirement not State and asked if the County is asking for more than what is required under the State Building Code. Mr. Fitzgerald confirmed that they were asking for more because they were following the ISO standards.

Mr. Karaffa moved, seconded by Mr. Moore, that the Board authorize staff to advertise for public hearing.

Vote was as follows: Yeas: Pattie, Karaffa, Shull, Wills, Moore and Pyles Nays: None Motion carried.

* * * § 25-672: Site Plan Requirements • Current ordinance requires a full site plan for any new buildings permitted by Special Use Permit • Proposed amendment will require a full site plan for new buildings permitted by Special Use Permit if required by the BZA.

Mr. Fitzgerald mentioned that Mr. Beyeler brought this forward with an issue that happened in Mr. Pattie’s district with a Special Use Permit and the requirements to provide a full site plan. Currently, the ordinance reads that if you are building a new building permitted by a Special Use Permit, that it was required to have a full site plan.

Some times these facilities are small in nature and often do not have the necessity of having a full site plan. The proposed amendment would be to only require a full site plan if required by the Board of Zoning Appeals.

Mr. Karaffa said that the current ordinance is an “overkill”.

Mr. Karaffa moved, seconded by Mr. Shull, that the Board authorize staff to advertise for public hearing.

Vote was as follows: Yeas: Pattie, Karaffa, Shull, Wills, Moore and Pyles Nays: None Motion carried.

* * * § 25-664: Nonconforming Lots • Current ordinance allows the boundaries of a nonconforming lot to be changed as long as the new lot is no less conforming than the original lot.

• Proposed amendment will allow the boundaries of the nonconforming lot to be changed as long as the nonconformity hasn’t been substantially increased, will not be a substantial detriment to adjacent property, and will not change the character of the district the lot is in.

Mr. Fitzgerald displayed the actual plat that lead to this discussion. They were essentially “squaring the lot up” making the distance 134 feet. The way the ordinance was written, it increased the nonconformity. The new ordinance would allow for this type of change to be made because it is not substantially more nonconforming.

Mr. Karaffa moved, seconded by Mr. Moore, that the Board authorize staff to advertise for public hearing.

Vote was as follows: Yeas: Pattie, Karaffa, Shull, Wills, Moore and Pyles Nays: None Motion carried.

* * * § 1-9: Copies of the County Code • Decreases from 3 to 1 the number of copies of the County Code required to be in the Office of the County Administrator and available for public inspection during normal business hours.

• The State Code requirement changed allowing the amendment.

• Code is also available on-line.

Patrick J. Morgan, County Attorney, advised that at one time, the State Code required that the County Administrator have three copies of the County Code in his office for public inspection. The State Code has changed to only require one copy. Because of a citizen inquiring about the three copies; it was discovered that three copies were not available and further discovered of the State Code revision. This amendment will bring the County Code in conformity with the State Code.

Mr. Pyles moved, seconded by Mr. Karaffa, that the Board authorize staff to advertise the ordinance amendments.

Vote was as follows: Yeas: Pattie, Karaffa, Shull, Wills, Moore and Pyles Nays: None Motion carried.

WAIVERS/VARIANCES – NONE

CONSENT AGENDA

Mr. Pyles moved, seconded by Mr. Moore, that the Board approve the consent agenda as follows:

MINUTES

Approved minutes of the following meetings:

• Staff Briefing Meeting and Regular Meeting (combined), Wednesday, January 22, 2014

CLAIMS

Approved claims paid since January 8, 2014.

Vote was as follows: Yeas: Pattie, Karaffa, Shull, Wills, Moore and Pyles Nays: None Motion carried.

MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED BY THE BOARD

The Board discussed the following issues:

Mr. Moore: Waynesboro Fire Department – heating and cooling system improvement.

Mr. Beyeler had contacted Mr. Moore on Saturday with the request of having the Wilson Fire Department request brought before the Board for consideration. Mr. Moore felt this was a “tribute to Dave of his commitment to his constituents and how seriously he took his Supervisor office. This was clearly a man on his deathbed. He had made a promise to Wilson Fire Department that he would help them with the project they had and he did not want that to slip through the cracks.” Wilson Fire Department had requested funds of $20,558.55 to help with heating and cooling improvements that were being made at the station.

Mr. Moore moved, seconded by Mr. Karaffa, that the Board approve the request for heating and cooling improvements for the Wilson Fire Department in an amount not to exceed $20,558.55. Payments will be made with submission of appropriate documentation for work completed and accepted by the agency.

Funding Source: South River Infrastructure Account #80000-8016-77 Vote was as follows: Yeas: Pattie, Karaffa, Shull, Wills, Moore and Pyles Nays: None Motion carried.

Chairman Wills asked Fire Chief Holloway if there were any problems with this request.

Fire Chief Holloway said there were no problems.

* * * Mr. Karaffa: Expressed condolences to the Beyeler family. He wanted to express publicly his “sincere appreciation to Dave’s 26 years of dedicated service and sacrifice. His experience and knowledge and character on the Board will be sorely missed.” Mr. Pyles: “Mr. Beyeler and I were sparring partners for 10 years. We went at it pretty good and I think it was (I’m not trying to pat myself on the back) partly because we were kind of the same person. We were both strong- willed, not-give-an-inch kind of people. I liked it in the fact that you always knew where Mr. Beyeler was. I think, in some cases, our going back and forth at it allowed people to hear different sides of an issue. But I feel very bad, today. I have a heavy heart. I will miss the gentleman. Outside of this building, it was a good relationship. He was always fund to be with, whether we were out at VACo, or he was at some event at Buffalo Gap FFA Breakfast, whatever, and he didn’t get everything wrong — as he would say about me. I have a lot of admiration for him and I don’t think you will find where we ever voted differently on any zoning issue, or the County-Code type of things, because I realized I didn’t know as much as he did. He had like an encyclopedia knowledge over code or a zoning ordinance because he wrote them all! He was there and I never thought that anything he said wasn’t logical or didn’t have a good basis for it and who was I to say differently? I don’t think you’ll find any of that in there.

He will be greatly missed in that regard. When I was Chairman, he was going to be on the Ordinance Committee because that was where he ought to be and that’s a hole that we will have to fill. I think things are well with his soul, tonight. I remember when Mr. Rosenberg sat in this chair over here and he came to us saying, ‘We can’t use the name Jesus in our invocations.’ Up to that point, Dave was always part of the rotation. He said, ‘Well, if I can’t pray to Jesus, I’m not going to pray.’ So he dropped out. It wasn’t because he wasn’t a man of faith; it was because he was a man of faith. Even though we were far apart, one time for about two months, Garber put me down there next to Dave; that didn’t last any time.

I will miss him. I knew two meetings, ago, something wasn’t right because the fire wasn’t there. There wasn’t the spirit, anymore. If I couldn’t raise him up, the adrenalin wasn’t going to do it. I just wanted to leave you with these words “I thought he was a good man, tried hard for his community, was a good family man, and he will be missed.” Mr. Pattie:

1. “I think Mr. Beyeler being on this Board with five new people was very instrumental in letting us know and giving us the background of his many years was needed. “ 2. Mt. Solon – Volunteers bunkroom and renovation of the kitchen are occurring. Funding will probably be discussed in the near future.

Mr. Shull: “I’m saddened just like every member on this Board. My thoughts and prayers go out to the Beyeler family and pray that the days ahead will get brighter. Time heals all things. Dave Beyeler has been around for a long time. I’ve been keeping up with politics for a number of years, now, and it wasn’t hardly a time that it wasn’t mentioned that Dave Beyeler was there.

I considered him a good friend and he will be sorely missed here. I don’t think that he would have run the last time, but he knew it was a bunch of rookies coming onboard and he wanted to see that everything was carried out. So far, I think, we’ve done a pretty good job. Dave is looking up there looking down on us. The meeting will carry on and business will continue. I hope we do a good job for him.” Chm. Wills:

1. “I first became aware of the graveness of Dave’s situation last Saturday; he first called Jeff; then he called me. His voice just was not strong on Saturday. On Monday, I knew that former Supervisor Gerald Garber and he were close and I had called Mr. Garber on Saturday and told him what was going on. Mr. Garber went out on Monday and Dave did not recognize Mr. Garber. We knew what the situation was. I have talked to Ms. Beyeler both yesterday and today. She is doing well. She is very strong through this and is really appreciative that there was no more pain and suffering than what there was. I think I can report to the Board that she is appreciative of the Board’s sentiments and welcomes our prayers. It has just been a real tough day in a lot of respects from that standpoint.” 2. Wayne District severe accident – CATS van was involved with several injuries.

3. ECC weather update – plans in place if major power outages, stations are already being manned and can be opened.

4. Richmond Legislative Day – Good reports! Big concerns! Good news – 1) Delay for implementation date of Stormwater until January 2015. 2) Chesapeake Bay Foundation – good chance in getting funding for monitoring rivers. Concerns – Individual County’s rights of zoning (Farm Bill and breweries). A safety hazard has to be determined to be able to do anything to conform.

MATTERS TO BE PRESENTED BY STAFF

Staff discussed the following:

1. Todd and Hearthstone Dams (North River District) – 1) Public meeting – April 3rd, 10:00 a.m. – 12:00 noon in the Smith Room West; 2) Sign-off Letter from Headwaters Soil and Water Conservation District requires County Administrator’s signature.

2. Board of Equalization Update 3. Mill Place Bush Hogging – reviewing responses 4. Audit Committee – still evaluating 5. Stormwater Management Letter – approved draft VSMP program package. Congratulations to Todd Flippen and Community Development staff.

6. VHDA Low Income Housing Tax Credits proposal received. Letter needed by April 1st. 7. Budget Work Session Schedule – March 24th and March 26th. Mr. Pyles suggested that the Board strongly consider the selection of the South River Magisterial District vacancy because of his (or her) responsibility during the budget process.

8. Chairman Wills asked if there were any interest in serving on the Ordinance Committee.

9. Mr. Moore mentioned that a new Preston Yancey Volunteer project (pave gravel parking lot) will be discussed in the near future.

CLOSED SESSION

On motion of Mr. Shull, seconded by Mr. Karaffa, the Board went into closed session pursuant to:

(1) the personnel exemption under Virginia Code § 2.2-3711(A)(1) [discussion, consideration or interviews of (a) prospective candidates for employment, or (b) assignment, appointment, promotion, performance, demotion, salaries, disciplining or resignation of specific employees]:

A) Boards and Commissions B) Board Appointees Evaluations C) New Hope Fire and Rescue On motion of Mr. Karaffa, seconded by Mr. Shull, the Board came out of Closed Session and adjourned subject to the call of the Chairman.

Vote was as follows: Yeas: Pattie, Karaffa, Shull, Wills, Moore and Pyles Nays: None Motion carried.

The Chairman advised that each member is required to certify that to the best of their knowledge during the closed session only the following was discussed:

1. Public business matters lawfully exempted from statutory open meeting requirements, and 2. Only such public business matters identified in the motion to convene the executive session.

The Chairman asked if there is any Board member who cannot so certify.

Hearing none, the Chairman called upon the County Administrator/ Clerk of the Board to call the roll noting members of the Board who approve the certification shall answer AYE and those who cannot shall answer NAY.

Roll Call Vote was as follows:

AYE: Pattie, Karaffa, Wills, Moore, Shull and Pyles NAY: None The Chairman authorized the County Administrator/Clerk of the Board to record this certification in the minutes.

ADJOURNMENT

There being no other business to come before the Board, Mr. Karaffa moved, seconded by Mr. Shull, the Board adjourned subject to call of the Chairman.

Vote was as follows: Yeas: Pattie, Karaffa, Shull, Wills, Moore and Pyles Nays: None Motion carried.

Chairman County Administrator h:2-12min.14